Figma's whiteboarding tool, built for design-adjacent brainstorming and workshops.
▲ 367
Visit →
FigJam vs Miro
Comparing FigJam and Miro to help you pick the right Digital Whiteboards for your needs.
| Feature | FigJam | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Web, macOS, Windows | Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android |
| Launched | 2021 | 2011 |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Community votes | 367 | 387 |
FigJam Pros & Cons
- Tight integration with Figma design files lets teams move between whiteboarding and design seamlessly
- Same account and billing as Figma simplifies adoption for existing Figma customers
- Real-time collaboration quality matches Figma's well-regarded multiplayer editing experience
- Lower individual editor pricing than Miro's comparable tiers
- Templates oriented toward design and product workflows specifically
- Less mature general-purpose template library than Miro for non-design-adjacent use cases
- Most valuable specifically for teams already using Figma, less compelling as a standalone purchase
- Smaller overall feature set than Miro's more whiteboarding-focused product investment
- Some advanced Miro-specific features (certain integrations, advanced diagramming) aren't matched
- Less brand recognition in pure whiteboarding context compared to Miro's category leadership
Miro Pros & Cons
- Infinite canvas removes the size constraints of a physical whiteboard entirely
- Real-time multi-user collaboration with visible cursors makes remote workshops feel genuinely interactive
- Large template library covers common workflows (retrospectives, mind maps, roadmaps) without starting from blank
- Strong integrations with project management and communication tools
- Works well for both structured workshops and open-ended brainstorming
- Free tier's 3-board limit is restrictive for teams running frequent sessions
- Can become visually overwhelming on very large, densely populated boards
- Real-time collaboration requires a stable internet connection for the best experience
- Some advanced features and security controls require Business tier or above
- Steeper learning curve than a physical whiteboard for participants unfamiliar with digital tools
Verdict: FigJam vs Miro
FigJam and Miro both serve the Digital Whiteboards category well, but suit different priorities. Miro supports more platforms (5 vs 3). Based on community engagement, Miro is currently the more widely adopted choice (387 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, FigJam or Miro?
- FigJam and Miro use a similar pricing model (both freemium), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is FigJam or Miro rated higher?
- FigJam and Miro currently hold comparable editorial ratings, so neither has a clear edge — the right pick depends more on which specific features and pricing fit your use case.
- Which platforms do FigJam and Miro support?
- FigJam is available on Web, macOS, Windows. Miro is available on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. Miro covers more platforms overall, which matters if your team works across a wider range of devices and operating systems.
- Can I switch from FigJam to Miro (or vice versa)?
- Most digital whiteboards tools, including FigJam and Miro, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose FigJam or Miro?
- FigJam and Miro both serve the Digital Whiteboards category well, but suit different priorities. Miro supports more platforms (5 vs 3). Based on community engagement, Miro is currently the more widely adopted choice (387 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.